Lapidary Foundation
Foundation
  • Articles
  • Patronage
Community
  • Materials
  • Collections
  • Designs
Atelier
  • Designer
  • Companion
12345255075100200231
01.001 Wheel Cut Brilliant
Hemrich, Gerald I; Gems & Minerals, Nov 1966, p16;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.002 Spiral Brilliant
Schreur, Clarence; Lapidary Journal, May 1963, p301;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.003 Scintillator Brilliant
Soukup, Edward J; Facet Cutters Handbook (1962) p63;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.004 Double Mirror Brilliant
Leiper, Hugh; Lapidary Journal, Jun 1958, p322;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.005 Split Diamond Box
Sperber, Kent; Lapidary Journal, Oct 1965, p812;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.006 Standard Brilliant
(anon) Steele, Norman W; Seattle F Design, Oct 1978;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.006A SRB Unstacked Mains
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v5 (1983) pC1;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.006B SRB Stacked Mains
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v5 (1983) pC2;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.007 Modified Brilliant
Livingston, Bob; Lapidary Journal, Apr 1950, p41;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.008 Briolette
Livingston, Bob; Lapidary Journal, Aug 1950, p194;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.009 Briolette Brilliant
Livingston, Bob; Lapidary Journal, Jan 1955, p420;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.010 A 120 Facet Brilliant
Johns, Floyd L; Lapidary Journal, Aug 1957, p362;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.011 Briolette
Stern, Sol W; Lapidary Journal, May 1967, p350;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.012 Modified Brilliant
Livingston, Bob; Lapidary Journal, Dec 1949, p345;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.013 Horiz Split Main Brilliant
Hartley, David; Lapidary Journal, Oct 1966, p852;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.014 Inspiration Brilliant
Hemrich, Gerald I; Gems & Minerals, Nov 1964, p25;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.015 Commercial Round Brilliant
Anon; Gems & Minerals, Dec 1966, p37;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.016 Cone
Moldowin, William; Canadian Rockhound vXI n6, Dec 1967;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.017 Crystalite
Hamm, Jack; Gems & Minerals, Dec 1967, p12;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.017A Crystalite Alternate
Hamm, Jack; Gems & Minerals, Dec 1967, p12;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.018 Crystalite Petals
Hamm, Jack; Gems & Minerals, Mar 1968, p31;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.019 Double Rose
Livingston, Bob; Lapidary Journal, Feb 1951, v4n6p442;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.020 Don Diego
Soukup, Edward J; Facet Cutters Handbook (1962) p53;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.021 Double Diamond
Vargas, Glenn & Martha; Faceting for Amateurs (1969) p136;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
12345255075100200231