Lapidary Foundation
Foundation
  • Articles
  • Patronage
Community
  • Materials
  • Collections
  • Designs
Atelier
  • Designer
  • Companion
1100125134135136137138139140141142143150175200231
19.004 Step Keystone
Vargas, Glenn & Martha; Diagrams for Faceting v1 (1975) p117;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
19.005 Split Facet Taper #1
Watermeyer, Basil; Diamond Cutting, 4th Ed. (1991) p334;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
19.006 Split Facet Taper #2
Watermeyer, Basil; Diamond Cutting, 4th Ed. (1991) p334;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
19.007 Standard Tapered Barion
Watermeyer, Basil; Diamond Cutting, 4th Ed. (1991) p334;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
19.008 Standard Keystone Barion
Watermeyer, Basil (diagram); Diamond Cutting, 4th Ed. (1991) p335;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
19.009 FVS-62 Bola
Van Sant, Fred W; Gems & Minerals, Sep 1984, p22;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
20.001 Half Moon
Pocklington, R L; Lapidary Journal, Nov 1975, p1474;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
20.002 Waxing Gibbous
Romack, Ed; Facets, Jun 1976, n17p6;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
20.003 Seminavette
Bruton, E; Diamonds 2nd Ed. (1978) p222 (diag only);
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
20.004 Semi-Navette Brilliant
Reinikka, M A & Long, R H; Facets, Sep 1979, n56p3;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
20.005 Demi Marquise
McCawley, Elton; Facets, Apr 1987, p9;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
20.006 Semi-Navette
Watermeyer, Basil; Diagrams for Faceting v3 (1987) p119;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
20.007 Demi-Marquise /c/
(McCawley) Smith, Paul C; Facet Talk, v8n60 (1991);
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
20.008 Seminavette Shield
(Watermeyer) Long, Robert H; Seattle F Design, Feb 1992;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
20.009 Barion Shield
(Watermeyer) Long, Robert H; Seattle F Design, Feb 1992, p2;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
20.010 FVS-239
Van Sant, Fred W; New Mexico Facetor, Aug 1992, v11n12;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
20.011 Half-Oval Checkerboard
Word, Sid; Facets, Jul 1994, p3;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
20.012 Sunrise Gem
Clark, Don; Lapidary Journal, Jan 1995, p120;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
20.013 FVS-303; Horseshoe
Van Sant, Fred W; Star Cuts 6;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
20.013A FVS-303 Horseshoe
Van Sant, Fred; Star Cuts - 6;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
21.001 Pinwheel
Hume, Ed; Seattle F Design, Jun 1967;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
21.001A Modified Pinwheel
(Hume) Van Sant, Fred W; USACF (now USFG) Newsletter, Sep 1992, p22;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
21.001B Modified Pinwheel
(Hume) Steele, Norman W; Tumbler, Mar 1994, p7;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
21.002 Brilliant Briolette
Anon; Lapidary Journal, Dec 1951, p364;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
1100125134135136137138139140141142143150175200231