Sol Lapidary

Lapidary Foundation

Foundation

Articles
Patronage

Community

Materials
Collections
Designs

Atelier

Designer
Companion

1 100 200 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 225 231

46.012 Mt ISA Variation

Fangrath, Sammy; Diagrams for Faceting v3 (1987) p99;

Refraction ≈ 1.54
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

46.013 Tourmaline Crystal

Covill, Charles W; Covill Original Designs (1994) 5-15;

Refraction ≈ 1.64
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

46.014 Klingon Anatomy

Capps, Jerry; Lapidary Journal, May 1994, p95;

Refraction ≈ 1.54
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

46.015 Tourmaline Crystal #2

Covill, Charles W; Covill Original Designs (1994) 5-16;

Refraction ≈ 1.64
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

46.016 Tourmaline Crystal #3

Covill, Charles W; Covill Original Designs (1994) 5-17;

Refraction ≈ 1.64
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

46.017 Tourmaline Crystal #4

Covill, Charles W; Covill Original Designs (1994) 5-18;

Refraction ≈ 1.64
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

46.019 For Fun

Huyhn, Michiko; Gemology Online Faceting Design Competition 2013;

Refraction ≈ 1.54
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

Gemology Project: 2013 Minimalist 1

—

Refraction ≈ 1.54
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

Gemology Project: 2013 Minimalist 2

—

Refraction ≈ 1.54
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

Gemology Project: 2013 Minimalist 3

—

Refraction ≈ 1.54
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

Gemology Project: 2013 Minimalist 4

—

Refraction ≈ 1.54
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

Gemology Project: 2013 Minimalist 5

—

Refraction ≈ 1.54
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

Gemology Project: 2013 Minimalist 6

—

Refraction ≈ 1.54
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

Gemology Project: 2013 Minimalist 7

—

Refraction ≈ 1.54
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

Gemology Project: 2013 Ostentatious 1

—

Refraction ≈ 1.54
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

Gemology Project: 2013 Ostentatious 2

—

Refraction ≈ 1.54
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

Gemology Project: 2013 Ostentatious 3

—

Refraction ≈ 1.54
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

Gemology Project: 2013 Vindictive 1

—

Refraction ≈ 1.54
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

Gemology Project: 2013 Vindictive 3

—

Refraction ≈ 1.54
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

Gemology Project: 2013 Vindictive 4

—

Refraction ≈ 1.54
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

Gemology Project: 2014 C1

—

Refraction ≈ 1.54
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

Gemology Project: 2014 C2

—

Refraction ≈ 1.54
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

Gemology Project: 2014 C3

—

Refraction ≈ 1.54
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

Gemology Project: 2014 C4

—

Refraction ≈ 1.54
Indices =
Facets = 89 + 16
L/W = 100.%
H/W = 69.9%
V/W³ = 25.4%

Diamond

Emerald

1 100 200 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 225 231