Lapidary Foundation
Foundation
  • Articles
  • Patronage
Community
  • Materials
  • Collections
  • Designs
Atelier
  • Designer
  • Companion
1212223242526272829305075100200231
01.551 6-16 V/S Crown Brilliant
Williams, Evan; Australian Facet Designs (1994) 1-15;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.552 Bi-Centennial Brilliant
Williams, Evan; Australian Facet Designs (1994) 1-16;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.553 Round Brilliant Brittop
Williams, Evan; Australian Facet Designs (1994) 1-18;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.554 Round Brilliant Highlite
Williams, Evan; Australian Facet Designs (1994) 1-19;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.74
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.555 Hallmark Crown
Pascal, John W; Lapidary Journal, May 1995, p93;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.556 Nichole's Cut
Low, Terry; Facets, Jun 1995, p3;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.557 Sixty Kites
Strickland, Robert W; TFG Newsletter, Apr 1995, p14;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.558 Doutfire
Johnson, Bob; Angles, Jul 1995, p6;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.559 Lace
Howell, Quincy D; Seattle F Design, Aug 1995;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.560 Capitol Dome
Standing, M B; American Gemcutter, Aug 1995, p29;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.561 Butterfly
Clark, Dan; Lapidary Journal, Sep 1995, p114;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.562 Snow Crystal
Green, John B; American Gemcutter, Sep 1995, p29;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.563 Star (Apexstar)
Beamer, W C; North York FG Newsletter, Sep 1995;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.564 High 11
Johnson, Bob; Angles, Oct 1995, p6;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.565 (No Name)
Green, John B; American Gemcutter, Nov 1995;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.566 Maltese Cross #2
Kolodny, Boris; North York FG Newsletter, Dec 1995;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.567 Pinnacle 96-1
Hirata, Herb; American Gemcutter, Jan 1996, p29;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.568 Round Barion Checker
Clark, Roscoe E; Facets, Jan 1996, p10;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.569 16 Sided Archimedes
Cornwall, John B; Lapidary Journal, Apr 1980, p266;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.570 FVS-293-1 Edge Brilliant #1
Van Sant, Fred W; USFG Newsletter, Mar 1996;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.571 FVS 293-2 Edge Brilliant #2
Van Sant, Fred W; USFG Newsletter, Mar 1996;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.572 Low Crown Cut
Sweeney, Boyd; Facet Talk, Jan-Feb 1996;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.573 Commercial
Sweeney, Boyd; Facet Talk, Jan-Feb 1996;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
01.574 Small Commercial
Sweeney, Boyd; Facet Talk, Jan-Feb 1996;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
1212223242526272829305075100200231