Lapidary Foundation
Foundation
  • Articles
  • Patronage
Community
  • Materials
  • Collections
  • Designs
Atelier
  • Designer
  • Companion
125506566676869707172737475100200231
05.009 Nassak Replica
Barbour, Tom R; Lapidary Journal, Feb 1962, p650;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.010 Pendeloque
Anon; Lapidary Journal, Feb 1955, p512;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.011 Pendeloque
Bailey, Roy W; Facetier, Jun 1966, n6;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.012 Pendeloque
Bailey, Roy W; Facetier, May 1966, n5;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.013 Sancy Replica
Barbour, Tom R; Lapidary Journal, Oct 1961, p452;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.014 Pendeloque
Murphy, Merril O; Lapidary Journal, May 1970, p342;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.015 Step Cut Pendeloque
Maloney, William J Jr; Lapidary Journal, Jun 1968, p470;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.016 Dresden Green Replica
Barbour, Tom R; Lapidary Journal, Apr 1962, p140;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.016A Dresden Green Replica
Kane, Robert E et al; Gems & Gemology, Winter 1990, p248-265;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.016B Dresden Green Replica
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Seattle F Design, Mar 1991, p4;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.017 Pendeloque
Vargas, Glenn & Martha; Faceting for Amateurs (1969) p123;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.018 Pendeloque
Miller, Dave; Facetier, Mar 1970, n46;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.019 Pear Shaped Rose
Steele, Norman W; Seattle F Design, May 1970;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.020 DFW Pendeloque
Strickland, Robert W; Facets, Sep 1992, p3;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.021 Sultry Teardrop
Newcomb, Craig; Off the Dop, Apr 1993, v4n2;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.022 Pear Shape
Grant, Arthur; Facetier, Aug 1973, n88;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.023 Nine Mains Pendeloque
Long, Robert H; Seattle F Design, Mar 1975;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.024 French Blue Replica
Switzer, Marcus; Lapidary Journal, Sep 1975, p1178;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.025 21 Skidoo
Word, Sid; Facets, Sep 1975, n8p6;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.026 Brilliant Shield
Vargas, Glenn & Martha; Diagrams for Faceting v1 (1975) p50;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.027 Step Pendeloque
Vargas, Glenn & Martha; Diagrams for Faceting v1 (1975) p110;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.028 One Eighth Sphere Dome
Vargas, Glenn & Martha; Diagrams for Faceting v1 (1975) p148;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.029 Nine Main Pendeloque
Ricks, Thomas J; Facets, Aug 1977, p4;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
05.030 Nine Main Pendeloque (CAM)
Long, Robert H; Facets, Jan 1977, p6;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
125506566676869707172737475100200231