Lapidary Foundation
Foundation
  • Articles
  • Patronage
Community
  • Materials
  • Collections
  • Designs
Atelier
  • Designer
  • Companion
125507593949596979899100101102200231
09.042A Mod Radiating Square /c/
(Wollert) Steele, Norman W; Seattle F Design, Sep 1985, p3;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.042B Mod Radiating Square /c/
(Wollert) Steele, Norman W; Seattle F Design, Sep 1985, p3;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.043 Barion Square Cushion
Wolkonsky, Alexandre; Facets, Oct 1985, p4;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.044 ARC 4
Weaver, David S; Gems & Minerals, Oct 1985, p40;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.045 Square Cushion Barion
Watermeyer, Basil; Seattle F Design, Sep 1986, p1;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.046 Barion Square Cushion
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v6 (1987) pC30;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.047A Square Cushion Barion
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v6 (1987) pC31;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.047B Square Cushion Barion
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v6 (1987) pC29;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.048 Cushion Square Barion
Word, Sid; Facets, Jan 1988, p3;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.049 Split Facet Square Cushion
Watermeyer, Basil; Diagrams for Faceting v3 (1987) p50;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.050 Americana
Covill, Charles; TFG Newsletter, Aug 1987, p2-3;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.051 Square Antique Cushion 6
Wollert, Ernst; Diagrams for Faceting v2 (1983) p144;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.052 Square Antique Cushion 7
Wollert, Ernst; Diagrams for Faceting v2 (1983) p144;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.053 Bulgey-Square Brill
Jackson, Cliff; Off the Dop, Apr 1988;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.054 Foursquare Brilliant
Aspin, R; Lapidary Journal, Jan 1972, p1390;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.055 Modified Square (Nine Squares)
Ferris, Elmer W; Lapidary Journal, Jun 1973, p470;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.056 Square Brilliant HSM
Vargas, Glenn & Martha; Faceting for Amateurs (1969) p162;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.057 Quadrille
Strout, Edith; Lapidary Journal, Oct 1973, p1048;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.058 Square Dance
Strout, Edith; Lapidary Journal, Oct 1973, P1050;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.059 Square Highlight Brilliant
Strout, Edith; Lapidary Journal, Oct 1973, p1044;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.060 Antique Window
Older, Clifford; Faceter's Gem Cuts, v2(1977) p70;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.061 Old Mine Variation
Word, Sid; Faceter's Gem Cuts, v2(1977) p60;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.062 Old Mine Brilliant
Reinikka, M & Walker, R; Faceter's Gem Cuts, v2(1977) p71;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
09.063 Desuton #1
Long, Robert & Steele, Norman; Seattle F Design, Apr 1989, p4;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
125507593949596979899100101102200231