Lapidary Foundation
Foundation
  • Articles
  • Patronage
Community
  • Materials
  • Collections
  • Designs
Atelier
  • Designer
  • Companion
125333435363738394041425075100200231
02.078B Choval 1.25
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v1A (1982) pC16;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.078C Choval 1.33
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v1A (1982) pC16;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.078D Choval 1.40
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v1A (1982) pC16;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.078E Choval 1.50
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v1A (1982) pC16;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.079A Checker Oval 1.20
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v1A (1982);
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.079B Checker Oval 1.25
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v1A (1982);
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.079C Checker Oval 1.33
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v1A (1982);
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.079D Checker Oval 1.40
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v1A (1982);
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.079E Checker Oval 1.50
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v1A (1982) pC44;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.080A Another Lazy 1.20
Long, Robert H; Facet Design v1A (1982) pC17;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.080B Another Lazy 1.25
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v1A (1982);
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.080C Another Lazy 1.33
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v1A (1982) pC25-C38;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.080D Another Lazy 1.40
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v1A (1982) pC28-C40;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.080E Another Lazy 1.50
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v1A (1982) pC17;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.081 Informal Oval
Thompson, Phil; Lapidary Journal, Sep 1982, p1112;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.082A Step Oval 1.20
Long, Robert H & Steele, Norman W; Facet Design (1982);
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.082B Step Oval 1.25
Long, Robert H & Steele, Norman W; Facet Design (1982);
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.082C Step Oval 1.33
Long, Robert H & Steele, Norman W; Facet Design v1A (1982);
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.082D Step Oval 1.40
Long, Robert H & Steele, Norman W; Facet Design v1A,;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.082E Step Oval
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v1A (1982);
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.083E Split Facet Oval L/W1.50
Steele, Norman W; Seattle F Design, Dec 1982;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.084 Cut 1603
Conley, Richard B; The Faceter's Gem, v17n2, Jun 1983, p21;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.085 Double Rose Oval
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Seattle F Design, May 1983, p2;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.086 Latin Cross Oval
Steele, Norman W; Seattle F Design, Dec 1992, p1;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
125333435363738394041425075100200231