Lapidary Foundation
Foundation
  • Articles
  • Patronage
Community
  • Materials
  • Collections
  • Designs
Atelier
  • Designer
  • Companion
125353637383940414243445075100200231
02.107 FVS-088
Van Sant, Fred W; Star Cuts II (1989) p88;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.107A FVS-88
Van Sant, Fred; Star Cuts II (1989);
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.108 FVS-107
Van Sant, Fred W; Star Cuts II (1989) p107;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.108A FVS-107
Van Sant, Fred; Star Cuts II (1989);
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.109 Dahlia
Anon (DeBeers); Facets, Dec 1988, n167p6;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.110 FVS-140
Van Sant, Fred W; Star Cuts III (1989) p140;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.110A FVS-140
Van Sant, Fred; Star Cuts III (1989);
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.111 Oval Star
Covill, Charles W; Seattle F Design, Jun 1990;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.111A Oval Star
Covill, Charles W; Seattle F Design, Jun 1990, p1;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.112 Mixed Brilliant Oval
Wolkonsky, Alexandre; Seattle F Design, Dec 1990, p2;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.113A Milli 1.20
Long, Robert H; Unpublished Feb 1991;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.113B Milli 1.25
Long, Robert H; Unpublished 11 Feb 1991;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.113C Milli 1.33
Long, Robert H; Seattle F Design, Feb 1991, p4;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.113D Milli 1.40
Long, Robert H; Seattle F Design, May 1991, p1;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.113E Milli 1.50
Long, Robert H; Seattle F Design, Dec 1992, p2;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.114A Net 1.20
Long, Robert H; Unpublished 11 Feb 1991;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.114B Net 1.25
Long, Robert H; Unpublished 11 Feb 1991;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.114C Net 1.33
Long, Robert H; Seattle F Design, Aug 1994;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.114D Net 1.40
Long, Robert H; Seattle F Design, Jun 1991;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.114E Net 1.50
Long, Robert H; Seattle F Design, Jun 1991, p2;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.115 Fat Oval
Word, Sid; Facets, Feb 1991, p3;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.116 Standard Oval Brilliant
Sweeney, Sean P; Lapidary Journal, Feb 1991, p;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.117 Easy Ten Main Oval #1
Long, Robert H; Unpublished 14 Oct 1991;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.117A Easy Ten Main Oval #2
Long, Robert H; Unpublished 14 Oct 1991;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
125353637383940414243445075100200231