Lapidary Foundation
Foundation
  • Articles
  • Patronage
Community
  • Materials
  • Collections
  • Designs
Atelier
  • Designer
  • Companion
125373839404142434445465075100200231
02.133A Ten Ray Brilliant Star Oval
Wolkonsky, A & Van Zanten, P; Facets, Apr 1994, p3;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.134 Flashy Garnet
Thomas, Keith; Seattle F Design, Apr 1994, p2;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.135 FVS-28 Oval
Van Sant, Fred W; Star Cuts I (1980) p28;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.136 Checkerboard Oval
Word, Sid; Facets, May 1994, p3;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.137 Hexbar Oval 1:1.20
Strickland, Robert W; TFG Newsletter, Apr 1994, v15n2p20;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.137A Hexbar Oval 1:1.25
Strickland, Robert W; TFG Newsletter, Apr 1994, v15n2p21;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.137B Hexbar Oval 1:1.33
Strickland, Robert W; TFG Newsletter, Apr 1994, v15n2p22;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.137C Hexbar Oval 1:1.40
Strickland, Robert W; TFG Newsletter, Apr 1994, v15n2p23;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.138 Stretched Standard Brilliant
Steele, Norman W; Seattle F Design, Aug 1995, p1;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.139 Armadillo Oval
Northrup, Paul; American Gemcutter, Aug 1994, p29;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.140 Hope Replica
Barbour, Tom R; Lapidary Journal, Aug 1961, p345;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.140A Modern Hope Replica
(McCawley) Long, Robert H; Seattle F Design, Jun 1988, p2;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.141 Lazy Choval
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v1A (1982);
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.141B Lazy Choval
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v1A (1982);
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.141C Lazy Choval
Long, R H & Steele, N W; Facet Design v1A (1982);
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.142 Loneoval
Parrinello, Mike; TFG Newsletter, Jan 1995, p16;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.143A Oval Brilliant 12 Main (050.GEM)
Williams, Evan; Australian Facet Designs (1994) v3p6;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.143B Oval Brilliant 12 Main (051.GEM)
Williams, Evan; Australian Facet Designs (1994) v3p7;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.76
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.143C Oval Brilliant 12 Main (052.GEM)
Williams, Evan; Australian Facet Designs (1994) v3p8;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.143D Oval Brilliant 12 Main (053.GEM)
Williams, Evan; Australian Facet Designs (1994) v3p9;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.76
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.143E Oval Brilliant 12 Main (054.GEM)
Williams, Evan; Australian Facet Designs (1994) v3p10;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.54
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.143F Oval Brilliant 12 Main (055.GEM)
Williams, Evan; Australian Facet Designs (1994) v3p11;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.76
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.143G Oval Brilliant 12 Main (056.GEM)
Williams, Evan; Australian Facet Designs (1994) v3p12;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.76
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
02.144A Oval Brilliant 14 Main (057.GEM)
Williams, Evan; Australian Facet Designs (1994) v3p13;
  • Refraction ≈ 1.74
  • Indices =
  • Facets = 89 + 16
  • L/W = 100.%
  • H/W = 69.9%
  • V/W³ = 25.4%
Diamond
Emerald
125373839404142434445465075100200231